Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58677 (AP)

BOLISETTY SRINIVAS, KRISHNA DIST v. PRL SECY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT, HYDERABAD & 3 OTHERS

WP/8052/2015 · 2025-11-19

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010234522015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 8052 OF 2015 Between: 1. BOLISETTY SRINIVAS, KRISHNA DIST, S/o. Bolisetty Rama Krishna Rao, Hindu, aged about 47 years, L.I.C. Development Officer, R/o. D.No.11-193/1, Godavarthivari Mill street, Chemmanagiripeta, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND 1. PRL SECY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT HYDERABAD 3 OTHERS, Represented by its Principal Secretary, (Social Welfare Department), A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Tribunal Officer and SubDivisional Magistrate, Bandar, Krishna District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Machilipatnam Town Circle, C/o. Circle Office, Upstairs of Robertsonpet Police Station, Machilipatnam, Krishna District 4. Bolisetty Rama Krishna Rao, S/o. Venkata Ratnam, Hindu, aged about 72 years, Retired Employee, R/o. D.No.11-193/1, Godavarthivari Millu street, Chemmanagiripeta, Machilipatnam, Krishna District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the Proceedings Rc.No.H.2452/2014 dated 03/03/2015 SRK, J W.P.No.8052 of 2015 2 issued by the Tribunal Officer and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bandar Division, Machilipatnam, the 2nd Respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the writ Petitioner under Articles 14, 21, 300-A of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and consequently set aside the same in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SIVALENKA RAMACHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondents: YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA SRK, J W.P.No.8052 of 2015 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition has been filed questioning the proceedings in Rc.No.H2452/2014, dated 03.03.2015, issued by 2nd respondent - Tribunal Officer and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bandar Division, Machilipatnam. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:20.11.2025 Nsr SRK, J W.P.No.8052 of 2015 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.8052 of 2015 Date:20.11.2025 Nsr