Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58675 (AP)

Dixit Madanlal Jain v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8495/2022 · 2025-11-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010154272022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8495/2022 Between: DIXIT MADANLAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O MADANLAL PUKHRAJ JAIN, R/O SHARAD VILLA, FLAT NO. 5, BHANDUP, WEST MUMBAI-78. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.15 (OLD), NEW DOOR NO.18, WARD 17, RAYAJI STREET, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GUNTUR, PRAKASAM AND NELLORE RANGE, OFFICE AT GUNTUR. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINNA BAZAAR P.S,'SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. BOMMIDALA ANITHA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, W/O RAMA KRISHNA, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O RING ROAD, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. DR MATURI BABITA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O RAMESH, R/O GAYATRI NAGAR, MUDA MYTHRIVANAM, AMEERPET, SANJEEVAREDDY NAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. HARINADH NIDAMANURI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 herein in repeatedly interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioner herein and Respondent Nos.5 to 7 in respect of property admeasuring an extent of 11.8 Ankanams (94.4 Sq.Yards) in House No.15 (Old), New Door 2 No.18, Ward 17, Rayaji Street, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District without following due process of law as being illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner herein and Respondent Nos.5 to 7 in respect of property admeasuring an extent of 11.8 Ankanams (94.4 Sq.Yards) in House No.15 (Old), New Door No.18, Ward 17, Rayaji Street, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District.” 2. Ms.Rithwika, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Police are interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, regarding the subject property, Crime No.300 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 read with 34 and 109 IPC and Crime No.94 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 447, 427 and 506 read with 34 IPC have been registered. However, the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents, except under due process of law. However, it does not preclude the Police to investigate into Crime Nos.300 of 2021 and 94 of 2022. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8495 of 2022 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh