APHC010530232022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 32361/2022 Between: GEDELA RAMESH KUMAR, S/O. G GOWRI NAIDU LATE, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. H. NO. 277, TALVARAM MAIN STREET, TALVARAM, VEERAGHATTAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , SRIKAKULAM, SRIAKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , VEERAGHATTAM POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PALAKONDA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKONDA DIVISION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, VEERAGHATTAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. BORA SESHIBHUSHANA RAO, S/O. APPALASWAMY NAIDU, AGED NOT KNOWN, OCC- STEEL PLANT EMPLOYEE, R/O. TALAVARAM VILLAGE, VEERAGHATTAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in registering the FIR/Crime in pursuance to the complaint made to the 2nd respondent on 23.06.2021 (Since the 3rd respondent declined to receive the complaint) by the petitioner detailing that the 7th respondent trespassed into the petitioner's private lands without consent as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith register the Crime against the 7th respondent in pursuance to the complaint dated 23.06.2021 made to the 2nd respondent as per law.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police have not received any complaint or representation from the Petitioner. 3. None represented for the Petitioner. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32361 of 2022 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh