$~14 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 # CNR No. DLHC011036802025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 93/2025 & CM APPL.80477/2025 15 # CNR No. DLHC011036772025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 100/2025 & CM APPL.80605/2025 16 # CNR No. DLHC011036782025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 101/2025 & CM APPL.80608/2025 17 # CNR No. DLHC011036792025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 102/2025 & CM APPL.80611/2025 18 # CNR No. DLHC011036812025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 94/2025 & CM APPL. 80585/2025 19 # CNR No. DLHC011036822025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 95/2025 & CM APPL. 80590/2025 20 # CNR No. DLHC011036832025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 96/2025& CM APPL. 80593/2025 21 # CNR No. DLHC011036842025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 97/2025 & CM APPL. 80596/2025 22 # CNR No. DLHC011036852025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 98/2025 & CM APPL. 80599/2025 23 # CNR No. DLHC011036862025 + MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 99/2025 & CM APPL. 80602/2025 MR. GURUPADA MAJI ANJANIPUTRA SALES PVT. LTD. M/S CALENDULA VINCOM PVT. LTD JPS ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ALPANA MONDAL This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:39:20 M/S AMARJYOTI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD JOYDEB MONDAL ONWARD INVESTMENT ADVISORY PRIVATE LIMITED MANUSH COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED M/S GOLDY DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai, Mr. Surya Pratap Singh and Mr. Sirhaan Seth, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Mr. Sagar Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R % 12.08.2026 1. These appeals have been filed under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘PMLA’), challenging the order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA, New Delhi in the appeals bearing nos. FPA-PMLA-5648/DLI/2023, FPA-PMLA-5649/DLI/ 2023, FPA-PMLA/5650/DLI/2023, FPA-PLMA-5651/DLI/2023, FPA-PMLA/5652/DLI/2023, FPA PMLA/5653/DLI/2023, FPA- PMLA/5729/DLI and FPA-PMLA-5629/DLI/2023 2. The appellants herein neither reside nor carry on business or work for gain in Delhi, and the properties in question are also not situated within the jurisdiction of this Court. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked only on the basis that the Appellate Tribunal is situated at Delhi. We have already considered similar contention in This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:39:20 our judgment in JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited. v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai & Anr, 2026:DHC:1527-DB, where after examining Section 42 of the PMLA, we have held as under:- “10. A reading of the above provision would show that it is only the High Court where the aggrieved party is residing or carrying on business or personally working for gain, that would have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Mere presence of the learned Appellate Tribunal at Delhi would not vest this Court with the territorial jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.” 3. In view of the above, the appeals along with the pending applications are dismissed on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, however, we leave it open to the appellants to avail of their remedies in accordance with law before a Court of appropriate jurisdiction. 4. In case, the appellants invoke such remedy, their entitlement to claim relief under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 shall be determined by the Competent Court. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J AUGUST 12, 2026/ib/ma/pb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:39:20