1 APHC010621322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32349/2025 Between: 1. YASARAPU HARIBABU, S/O BATTEIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O YEGUVA VEEDHI VILLAGE SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. CHILLAKURU CHENGALRAYALU, S/O CHENGAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O YEGUVA VEEDHI VILLAGE, SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. CHINDEPALLI MUNI NARASIMHULU, S/O MANI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O KONDAMITTA, SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. C MOHANA KRISHNA, S/O MANI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O KONDAMITTA, SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. Y DILIPKUMAR REDDY, S/O JAYARAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O KONDAMITTA, SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRI KALAHASTI REVENUE 2 DIVISION, SRI KALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, SRI KALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, SRI KALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 6. POLAMREDDY VISHNU KUMAR REDDY, S/O VENKATA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O YEGUVAVEEDHI VILLAGE, SRI KALAHASTI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in particular Respondents 4 and 5 in not completing the survey in pursuance of the PGRS Application No.TPT202509295155 dated 29-9- 2025, even after issuing notices on 6-10-2025, 8-10-2025, and 10-10-2025 for conducting survey to show the field canal in Sy.No.24/5,35/5,34/2 in Yeguva Veedhi Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati Distirct, by the 5th Respondent as arbitarary, illegal, for extraneous considerations, and in violation of Article 14, and 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently driect Respondents 4 and 5 to conduct the survey in pursuance of the PGRS Application No.TPT202509295155 dated 29-9-2025 to show the field channel and Bandidari in Sy.No.34/2, Sy.NO.35/5 in Sy.No.30/1 and in Sy.No.24/5 in Yeguva Veedhi Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati Distirct, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct Respondents 4 and 5 to conduct the survey in pursuance of the PGRS Application No.TPT202509295155 dated 29-9-2025, to show the field channel and Bandidari in Sy.No.34/2, Sy.NO.35/5, in Sy.No.30/1 and in Sy.No.24/5 in Yeguva Veedhi Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati Distirct pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.32349 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking to direct Respondent Nos.4 and 5 to conduct survey in pursuance of the PGRS application No. No.TPT202509295155, dated 29.9.2025 filed by the petitioners. 2. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has made an application, dated 29.09.2025 seeking to conduct survey and requested the respondent authorities several times for conduct survey. But, the respondents are not conducting survey at the behest of the 6th respondent, which is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner requests to pass appropriate orders. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case and deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition at the stage of admission. 4. Accordingly, notice to the 6th respondent is dispensed with and Writ Petition is disposed of directing Respondent Nos.4 and 5 to consider the application made by the petitioners, dated 29.09.2025 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5 There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date : 21.11.2025 TM 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.32349 of 2025 Date: 21.11.2025 tm 7