SMT. MANGALI RAMANJINAMMA W/O. ALTE MANGALI v. KURNOOL RAJU @ RAJA
MFA/100274/2022 · 2025-02-13
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5866 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5866 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100274 OF 2022 (MV I)
BETWEEN
1 . SMT. MANGALI RAMANJINAMMA W/O. LATE MANGALI BHIMALINGA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
2 . MINOR MANGALI LAKSHMI D/O. LATE MANGALI BHIMALINGA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS.
3 . MINOR PRAVEEN S/O. LATE MANGALI BHIMALINGA AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS,
4 . MINOR SANDHYA D/O. LATE MANGALI BHIMALINGA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS,
THE PETITIONER NO. 3 AND 4 ARE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER THE PETITIONER NO. 1 AS NATURAL GUARDIAN.
5 . MANGALI BOJANNA S/O. LATE ULLUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/O. YERURU VILLAGE, CHIPPAGIRI MANDALAM, ALURU TALUKA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, NOW R/O. AT SHIVALINGA NAGAR,
2 WARD NO. 33, BALLARI-583101 ... APPELLANTS (By SRI : Y LAKSHMIKANT REDDY)
AND 1 .
KURNOOL RAJU @ RAJA S/O LATE K CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, DRIVER OF THE AUTO BEARING NO. AP-21/X-6992, R/O. H.NO. 71069 NEAR SJP HIGH SCHOOL, INDIRA NAGAR, GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
2 .
TIRUPALU CHAKALI S/O. C RAMNJULU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OWNER OF THE AUTO BEARING NO. AP-21/X-6992, R/O. B C COLONY, KASAPURAM ROAD, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURU DISTRICT.
3 .
P OBULAPATHI S/O. P CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YERS, POLICY HOLDER OF THE AUTO BEARING NO. AP-21/X-6992, R/O. 1-102, YERUR VILLAGE, CHOPPAGIRI MANDALAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT
4 .
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER M/S. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, BALLARI.
…RESPONDENTS
* * * * *
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 23.12.2019 passed in MVC No.46/2016 on the file of The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-XII, Ballari.
3
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;
O R D E R
Finally two week time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE
//COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 29.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 100274 of 2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated
13.02.2025.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
T By: vg
C By: sdp