NITESH BHATI v. IDEAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY & ANR.
W.P.(C)/13394/2025 · 2026-08-04
Jasmeet Singh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5866 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5866 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010634002025 + W.P.(C) 13394/2025&CM APPL. 68560/2025 NITESH BHATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Hussain Adv Mr. Affan Husain Adv Ms. Anita Dev Adv Mr Sandeep Tyagi Adv for Petitioner versus IDEAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Adv. Mr.Hanu Bhaskar along with Adv. Ms. Anmol Bhaskar Adv. Arpit Srivastava, for R2 CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 04.08.2026
1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:-
“a) Issue a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to immediately conduct the viva voce (Exam Code LLB551) of the Petitioner for 9th Semester, and issue the supplementary marksheet of the same, in the interest of justice. b) Issue a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to issue the marksheet of 10th Semester (Exam Codes, LLB502 Dissertation, and LLB504 - Internship) of the Petitioner, as the Dissertation work, and Internship Certificate are already been submitted, so as to enable the Petitioner to complete the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/08/2026 at 11:53:19
Integrated B.A. LL.B. (H), Programme without further delay, in the interest of justice. c) Issue a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to declare the Petitioner’s results for all pending examinations, including viva voce, and issue the Petitioner’s final mark sheets of 5th years (9th & 10th semester), and degree forthwith.....”
2. Mr. Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, states that the petitioner has participated in the examinations and cleared the same. Hence the prayers sought by way of the present petition no longer survive. 3. Suffice to state that at this stage the reliefs sought by way of the present petition have already been granted and hence, the petition has become infructuous. 4. Mr. Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the respondent has illegally charged excess fee for permitting the petitioner to participate in the said examinations. 5. To my mind, this constitutes a fresh cause of action and the petitioner shall challenge the same in accordance with law. 6.
The petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the excess fee paid by the petitioner in accordance with the extant rules and regulations which shall be adjudicated on its own merits. 7. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J AUGUST 4, 2026 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/08/2026 at 11:53:19