1 2025:CGHC:55313 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9111 of 2025 Ghasiya Sahu S/o Shri Dhiraji Sahu Aged About 75 Years R/o Ghuma Chowki Biraijhar, P.S. Kurud, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Gobara Nawapara, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 13.11.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 285/2025, registered at Police Station- Gobara Nawapara, District- Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.11.13 17:21:56 +0530 2 Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the ‘NDPS Act’). 2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 24.07.2025, the Police of Police Station Gobara Nawapara received secret information from the informant, that the applicant is in possession of narcotic substance (Ganja) and was looking to sell it to buyers, and upon the said information the concerned police reached to the spot i.e., at infront of Krishiupaj Mandi, Nawapara, and seized about 1.50Kg Ganja from the applicant, kept in a white carry bag. Hence the applicant was arrested on 24.07.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that from the possession of the present applicant intermediate quantity of the psychotropic substance Ganja has been seized and therefore, it will not attract the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act as the commercial quantity for Ganja as prescribed under the schedule is more than 20 Kgs and from the possession of the present applicant, only 1.50 kgs of Ganja has been seized. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedents of NDPS Act against the present applicant and the charge-sheet has been filed and the trial is in progress, the applicant is in jail since 24.07.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application but admits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the applicant has no criminal antecedents under the NDPS Act. It is 3 submitted that 1.50 kgs of Ganja has been recovered from the possession of the applicant, therefore, his bail application is liable to be dismissed. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as considering the fact that the quantity of psychotropic substance Ganja seized from the possession of the applicant i.e. 1.50 kgs, which is less than commercial quantity as the commerial quantity of Ganja is 20 kgs, the applicant have no criminal antecedents under the NDPS Act or of any other nature, charge-sheet has been filed and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take sometime, and further that the applicant is in jail since 24.07.2025, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case without commenting on the merits of the case. 7. Let applicant, Ghasiya Sahu, involved in Crime No. 285/2025, registered at Police Station- Gobara Nawapara, District- Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the ‘NDPS Act’), be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, 4 it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 84 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section Section 209 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such 5 default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Manpreet