Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58647 (AP)

YVR AND COMPANY v. S SURESH KUMAR IAS

CC/1817/2025 · 2025-11-20

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010354122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1817/2025 Between: 1. YVR AND COMPANY, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, Y.V. RATNAM, S/O. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, MIGIIA114 GULLALAPALEM COLONY, SRIHARIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (RL) 2. M N HARENDHIRA PRASAD IAS, COMMISSIONER, THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (R2) 3. T PRASANNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-ILL O/O. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (R3) 4. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R4) ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 11.11.2024 passed in W.P. No. 22701 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 & 4 submits that, the order under contempt has already been complied with by clearing the bill on 21.11.2025 as per the letter of the 4th respondent dated 21.11.2025 which shall be made as part of the court record. 2. In view of the same, this contempt case is closed, as no cause survives. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 21.11.2025 NNN