1 2025:CGHC:56340 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4772 of 2023 1 - Bilal Husain S/o. Shri Mumtaz Husain, Aged About 33 Years R/o. 420, M-1 Block, Dolphin Jewelo Apartments Fundhar Road, Behind Himalaya Heights, Deopuri, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Union Of India Through Its Secretary Ministry Of Housing And Urban Poverty Alleviation Government Of India, Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi- 110011. 2 - Lic Housing Finance Limited, Corporate Office 131, Maker Tower-F Premises, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai -400005 Maharashtra. 3 - Chief Grievance Redressal Officer Executive Director, National Housing Bank, Core-5-A, India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 4 - The Regional Manager, Lic Housing Finance Limited, 2 Floor, Asha Avenue, Z-1, Zone-1, Mp Nagar, Bhopal -462011. 5 - Area Branch Manager, Lic Housing Finance Limited, 1st Floor Shyam Market, Pandri, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate (through video conferencing) For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Government Counsel For Respondents No. 2, 4 & 5 : Mr. Ayush Verma, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 2 19 /11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to hold that the impugned action on the part of respondent LIC Housing Finance Ltd. pay the subsidy amount from its own account, as the delay is caused by the respondent authority. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief to the petitioner which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), order(s), direction(s) in favour of the petitioner which may deemed fit and proper in the fact and circumstance of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has prayed for multiple relief(s) in the writ petition, however, the prayer of the petitioner at this stage is to direct the Respondents No. 3 & 4 to take decision on the representation which, he has submitted vide application dated 04.01.2022 (Annexure P/5) collectively. 3. Learned counsel for the respective respondents submits that as petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner dated 04.01.2022 (Annexure P/5) collectively, they are having no objection to the limited prayer. If the representation submitted by the petitioner is still pending consideration, it will be considered strictly in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents placed on record. 5. Taking into consideration, facts and circumstances of the case, submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing the Respondents No. 3 & 4 to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 04.01.2022 3 (Annexure P/5) collectively, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 03 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if already not decided. 6. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY