CHALAMALA SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/1295/2022 · 2025-11-19
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58640 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58640 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010012852022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1295/2022 Between:
1. CHALAMALA SATYANARAYANA, S/O DURGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 5-3-205, KESARA CHERUVU GATTU, PERAMPETA ROAD, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. CHALAMALA DURGA, W/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. H.NO. 5-3-205, KESARA CHERUVU GATTU, PERAMPETA ROAD, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. CHALAMALA GOPICHANDH, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, RIO. H.NO. 5-3-205, KESARA CHERUVU GATTU, PERAMPETA ROAD, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VE AGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT ET A.P, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR. 3. THE SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM DIVISION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DITRICT. 6. M SAGAR BABU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, PRESENTLY WORKING AS S.1 OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUCLEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. THE DEPUTY EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT, EXCISE DEPARTMENT, ELLURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2
9. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELLURU. 10. THE THASILDHAR, JAGAGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 11. SRI UDATALA DHATHU, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, PRESENTLY WORKING AS A VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 12. KOTHURI RAVI, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT MAJOR,
PRESENTLY WORKING AS V.R.A, JANGAREDDYGUEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari call for the records pertaining to the impugned illegal FIR.No.831/2021 registered under section 7B r/w 8(B) APPA 353, r/w 34 IPC dated 22/12/2021 of Jangareddygudem Police Station, West Godavari District without following the procedure under CRPC by violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under the articles and provisions of constitution of India and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners as per the FIR No.831/2021 dated 22/12/2021 under Section 7B r/w 8(B) APPA 353, r/w 34 IPC and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari call for the records pertaining to the impugned illegal FIR.No.831/2021 registered under section 7B r/w 8(B) APPA 353, r/w 34 IPC dated 22/12/2021 of Jangareddygudem Police Station, West Godavari District without following the procedure under CRPC by violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under the articles and provisions of constitution of India and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners as per the FIR No.831/2021 dated 22/12/2021 under Section 7B r/w 8(B) APPA 353, r/w 34 IPC and to pass...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the criminal case registered against the Petitioners is ended in acquittal, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh