Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58639 (PNJ)

INDERJEET SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/14299/2025 · 2025-05-19

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 139 Inderjeet Singh and others State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner Patwari and their the Punjab Revenue Patwari Rules of 2023 are not applicable as the advertisement was issued in the year 2021, regarding which been served, however, the same has yet not evoked any response. instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no o the limited prayer made. 2. In view of the above and without commenting up case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the Demand Notice dated 02.04.2025 this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the o adverse to their be free to seek legal redress thereupon 19.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14299 Date of decision: 19.05.2025 Inderjeet Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Kamaldip Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner and their 3 years probation period has to be reduced to 2 years in view of Punjab Revenue Patwaris Clause III Service Rules, 1966 2023 are not applicable as the advertisement was issued in the year 2021, regarding which a Demand Notice dated however, the same has yet not evoked any response. instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no o the limited prayer made. In view of the above and without commenting up this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to Demand Notice dated 02.04.2025, within a period of 4 this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the o their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner o seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 14299-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.05.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners were working as ars probation period has to be reduced to 2 years in view of s Clause III Service Rules, 1966 as the amended 2023 are not applicable as the advertisement was issued in the year dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P6) has however, the same has yet not evoked any response. He thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No working as ars probation period has to be reduced to 2 years in view of as the amended 2023 are not applicable as the advertisement was issued in the year ) has thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the bjection to on the merits of the this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to , which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair them rders are shall ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.19 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document