Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16613 of 2025 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. on behalf of State and perused the record.
2. The instant second bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.170 of 2023, under Sections 326 A, 326 I.P.C., P.S. Loha Mandi, District Agra, during pendency of the trial.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that three prosecution witnesses have been examined and on perusal of the statement of witnesses and material on record, no offence under the alleged sections is made out against the applicant. There is contradiction in the facts and the applicant is languishing in jail since 18.08.2023.
4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.
5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the submission advanced, I find no good ground for grant of bail to the applicant in the aforesaid case.
6. The second bail application is, accordingly, rejected.
7. However, the trial court is directed to decide the trial of the case, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Pandey, Vishnu Dutt Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sunil .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
either of the parties, preferably, within a period of nine months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. September 9, 2025 Meenu Singh BAIL No. 16613 of 2025 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad