Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58629 (BOM)

DADASAHEB TAKAJI JONDHALE AND OTHERS v. VIMAL MACHINDRA JONDHALE AND ORS

WP/460/2025 · 2025-11-10

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 58 WRIT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2025 DADASAHEB TAKAJI JONDHALE AND OTHERS VERSUS VIMAL MACHINDRA JONDHALE AND ORS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shermale K. N. Advocate for Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. U.S. Mote ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : November 10, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Parties have entered into compromise and by order dated 16.10.2025 this Court has directed the parties to remain present before the Registrar Judicial to verify the compromise. Parties have remained present before Registrar Judicial and the compromise was verified. Registrar Judicial has submitted report to this Court that he has verified the parties to the compromise, so also it was submitted that terms of compromise were explained to the parties and it is found that they have voluntarily entered into compromise. 2. Considering the same, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of compromise. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/ 2025:BHC-AUG:30725