APHC010337152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 17064 OF 2025 Between: 1. Mahalakshmi Harijana Fishermen Co-operative Society,, Regd.No. E-45, Meduru Village, Pamidimukkala Mandal, Krishna District, Rep. by its President, Chili Basavaiah, S/o.Venkayya. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary - Fisheries Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector Fisheries Wing, Krishna District, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3. The Joint Director, Fisheries Department, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4. The Deputy Director of Fisheries, /Ex- Officio Joint Registrar of Fishermen Co-Operative Societies, Gudivada, Krishna District. 5. The PersonInCharge PIC, The Fisheries Development Officer of Kankipadu, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing proceedings No.PPIC/2025, dated 07.05.2025 issued by the 4th respondent appointing SRK, J W.P.No.17064 of 2025 2 5th respondent Person In-Charge to the petitioners society without following procedure as illegal and arbitrary and violation of procedure contemplated U/s.32(7)(a)(i) Andhra Pradesh Co- Operative Societies Act and also violation of Article 14,19,300 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside same. Counsel for the Petitioner: B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FISHERIES SRK, J W.P.No.17064 of 2025 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition has been filed questioning the proceedings No.PPIC/2025, dated 07.05.2025, of 4th respondent appointing 5th respondent as person in-charge to the petitioner’s Society, without following the procedure as contemplated under law. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:21.11.2025 Nsr SRK, J W.P.No.17064 of 2025 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.17064 of 2025 Date:21.11.2025 Nsr