Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5861 (JHR)

LAXMAN BHAGAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1522/2025 · 2025-07-30

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:21061 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1522 of 2025 ------- 1. Laxman Bhagat, aged about 20 years, son of Sukhdeo Bhagat @ Chota Tana Bhagat, resident of village Kharki Bartoli, P.O. & P.S. Kisko, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand. 2. Budheswar Oraon, aged about 35 years, son of Mahali Oraon, resident of village Gindra Konatoli, P.O. & P.S Gumla, District Gumla, Jharkhand. …... …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …. Opp. Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH -------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P. P. -------- 03/ Dated 30.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 343 of 2024, for the offence registered under Section 309(4) of BNS, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Gumla. On 21.09.2024 between 3:30 p.m to 4:00 p.m, the informant was waylaid by four unknown persons near Bypass Road, Tarri Patra, Gumla. Unknown miscreants looted his motorcycle, Rs.800/- and other valuable articles. It was submitted that petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. It was further submitted that they have not been identified in T.I. Parade. However, it was very fairly submitted that looted motorcycle was recovered from the possession of petitioner No.2. In view of the aforesaid fact, I am inclined to release the petitioner No.1, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner No.1, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gumla, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 343 of 2024. As far as petitioner No.2 is concerned, I am not inclined to release the petitioner No.2, on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner No.2 is rejected at this stage. (Ambuj Nath, J.) BS/-