Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58605 (CHH)

SMT. USHA SIDAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5436/2023 · 2025-11-17

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56205 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5436 of 2023 Smt. Usha Sidar Wd/o Late Shri Sukhram Sidar, Aged About 61 Years R/o Kanchanpur, Pathan Mohalla, Sakti, Block And District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department of Water Resource, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Engineer in Chief Water Resource Department, Sector 19, Shivnath Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Engineer, Minimata Bango Project, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Engineer, Kelo Project Dam Circle, Kharsia, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - The District Treasurer Officer, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Prabhu Lal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, P.L. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.18 18:07:48 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 18.11.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authority to settle and get immediate remaining retirement benefits of the late retired husband of petitioner within prescribed time, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State having no objection. 4. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh