Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010052052019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2379/2019
Between:
1. R NAZEER AHAMMEDJA, S/O LATE N.A.RAHIMAN, MUSILIM AGED ABOUT. 50 YEARS, RESTENT OF D.NO. 17-4-108/A, HASNABAD, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE S H O 1 TOWN POLICE STAATION, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. ALFALAH CONSUMER NEEDS, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 33, 2' MAIN ROAD .KAUSEMAGER, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE, 560032. REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, FAIZUR REHMAN SHAIK, S/O IRFAN SHAIK, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS. 5. RIZWAN SHAIK, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OFFICE OF THE AL-FALAH CONSUMER NEEDS' HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 33, 2' MAIN ROAD ,KAUSEMAGER, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE, 560032. 2
6. SHABBIR AHAMMAD, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER , OFFICE OF THE AL-FALAH CONSUMER NEEDS' HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 33, 2' MAIN ROAD ,KAUSEMAGER, R.T. NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE, 560032. 7. MAHASIN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OFFICE OF THE AL-FALAH CONSUMER NEEDS' HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 33, 2' MAIN ROAD ,KAUSEMAGER, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE, 560032. 8. FAYAZ, MUSILIM AGED ABOUT. 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BESIDE SHANKER MEDICAL SHOP , NEAR GOVT HOSPITL ,HASNABAD, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.2379 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to issue any appropriate writ more particularly to issue writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 3rd respondent in registering F.I.R Against the Respondents 5 to 8 after receiving the petitioner complaint dated. 13-02-2019 is illegal, unjust, capricious, and to pass…”
2. None appeared for the writ petitioner. Notice taken to the writ petitioner was unserved as “addressee left without instructions, though intimated about the registered post”. 3.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that police registered a case in Crime No.49 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 420 and 506 r/w 34 IPC of Hindupur I Town Police Station, basing on the report received from the petitioner on 04.03.2019, and investigated the case, and later filed charge sheet before the Jurisdictional Magistrate on 30.12.2020. 4. The writ petition is filed alleging that police did not register F.I.R., though he presented a report dated 13.02.2019. 5. In the light of submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 4
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.10.2025 Pmk
5 03 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:2379 OF 2019
Date: 06.10.2025
Pmk