Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58597 (AP)

Chittamuru Venugopal Reddy v. Himanshu Shukla, IAS,

CC/2763/2025 · 2025-11-12

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010490992025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2763/2025 Between: 1. CHITTAMURU VENUGOPAL REDDY, W/O. LATE SUNDARRAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. PIDURU PALEM VILLAGE, BADDEVOLU POST, MANUBOLU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. HIMANSHU SHUKLA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. K SANTI, D/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. WORKING AS DISTRICT FISHARIES OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. SK CHAN BASHA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. WORKING AS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FISHARIES, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SANJAY STEPHAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. WORKING AS ASSISTANT INSPECTOR OF FISHARIES, MANUBOLU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. V VIJAYAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. WORKING AS SUPERINTENDING 2 ENGINEER, APSPDCL, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the contemnors herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, for willful disobedience and deliberately violating the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P. No. 15199 of 2025, dated 25.06.2025 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SARANU PHANI TEJA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2763/2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders dated 25.06.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.15199 of 2025. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel or the petitioner submits that pending the contempt case, the unofficial respondents assailed the order of this Court dated 25.06.2025 by way of Writ Appeal No.1073 of 2025 on the ground that no notice was served to them, even though they were impleaded as party respondents in the writ proceedings. It is further stated that after considering the submissions of the unofficial respondents/appellants, the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court was pleased to set aside the order impugned in this contempt case dated 25.06.2025 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by providing opportunity of hearing to the unofficial respondents/appellants. Since, the Writ Appeal is allowed, the order impugned in the present contempt case cannot be enforced. Hence, the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 13.11.2025 TTPPSS 4 152 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2763/2025 13.11.2025 TTPPSS