IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 139 NANCY AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of official respondents the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. It is submitted by the l are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 12.05.2025 consideration and hence, the present petition. 3. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: NANCY AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Aman Redhu, Advocate for the Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 8 and take action on 12.05.2025 (Annexure P-3). It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation 12.05.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5040 of 2025 Date of decision: 15.05.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the a writ of mandamus directing the protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation earned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the the at their representation earned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into Jyoti 2025.05.16 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.5040 of 2025 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to 5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learn State counsel and relationship as veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age o with a direction to the respondent No.2 Secretariat, Sonipat dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P do the needful expeditiously. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. 15.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5040 of 2025 Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learn State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-The Superintendent of Police, Secretariat, Sonipat to look into the matter and dispose of the representation 12.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with l necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to he needful expeditiously. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.5040 of 2025 -2- Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned going into the question of legality of their well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the f the petitioners, this petition is disposed of The Superintendent of Police, Mini to look into the matter and dispose of the representation ) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No , accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to ed going into the question of legality of their well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the f the petitioners, this petition is disposed of Mini to look into the matter and dispose of the representation aw and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the Jyoti 2025.05.16 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document