Pasem Venkata Sheshagiri Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/2902/2022 · 2025-11-12
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58593 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58593 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010038372022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2902/2022 Between:
PASEM VENKATA SHESHAGIRI RAO, S/O.LATE ANKAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BALAJI STREET, KATCHERIMITTA D.N010-49- 63/7, KAVALI TOWN AND MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KAVALI RURAL POLICE STATION, KAVALI TOWN AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. KONDA KAVURI SHESHAGIRI SHARMA, S/O.VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, C/O. IYYAPPASWAMY TEMPLE, KALUGOLAMMAPETA, KAVALI TOWN AND MANDAL,S.P.S.R.
NELLORE DISTRICT,
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action to the 3rd respondent who has orally calling the petitioner to police station by compelling him to settle the civil dispute pertaining to Plot No87 in S.No893, Auto Nagar , Kavali which is the suit schedule property in O.S.No157/2021 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge Court, Kavali as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21
2
and 300A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice.”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Dr.G.V.Ravi, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no further orders are required in this matter as the relief has become infructuous.
3. Sri V.Farooq, leaned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.2902 of 2022
Dt.13.11.2025
Dinesh