1 2025:CGHC:55438 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12860 of 2025 1 - Smt. Gesmoti Patel W/o Shri Susheel Kumar Patel Aged About 60 Years Working As Lecturer (Sanskrit) In Govt. High School Sighoda, Block And Tahsil - Saraipali, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Public Instructions Directorate Indravati Bhawan Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Raipur Tahsil And District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector Cum Chairman District Rationalization Committee Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 5 - The District Education Officer Cum Secretary District Rationalization Committee Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 6 - The Principal Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School Saraipali, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 7 - The Principal Govt. High School Singhoda, Block And Tahsil - Saraipali, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 8 - The Block Education Officer Saraipali, Block And Tahsil - Saraipali, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate. For State : Mr. Suyash Dhar Badgaiyan, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 13/11 /2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue her representation pending before the District Level Rationalization Committee. He would further submit that a direction may kindly be issued to the said committee to decide petitioner’s representation. ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.13 18:27:17 +0530 2 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. 4. The State Level Rationalization Committee is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner as early as possible. The petitioner is also at liberty to challenge the action taken by the said Committee, if not satisfied. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun