912-WP3984-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 3984 OF 2025 DR. ZAKIR HUSSAIN SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi h/for Mr. Vinayak. D. Patnurkar GP for Respondents-State: Mr. A. B. Girase .… CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 26.03.2025 PER COURT :- . Heard. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that irrespective of prayer clause (B), for the time being, the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 26.12.2023 (Exhibit-K) in accordance with the law. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, directing Respondent No. 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation (Exhibit-K) on its own merits and in accordance with the law, under intimation to him, as expeditiously as possible and, in any case, within eight (08) weeks. [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] HRJadhav 1 of 1 2025:BHC-AUG:8971-DB