Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58582 (CHH)

Smt. Krishna Dehariya v. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited

WPS/2251/2016 · 2025-11-16

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2251 of 2016 1. Smt. Krishna Dehariya W/o Dinesh Kumar Dehariya, Aged About 41 Years, Presently Posted And Working As Office Assistant- Ill, Office Of The Superintending Engineer (HRD), Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Korba (West), Korba Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Chempavati Dehariya, W/o Amarlal Dehariya, Aged About 43 Years, Presently Posted And Working As Office Assistant- Ill, Office Of The Executive Engineer (Store Division), Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Korba (West), Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited Through Its Managing Director, Danganiya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2. Executive Director (HR), Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Danganiya, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. Chief Engineer (HR), Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Danganiya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 4. General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Danganiya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 5. Executive Director, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, HTPS, Korba (West), Korba (Chhattisgarh). ... Respondents For Petitioners : None. For Respondents : Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate. CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.17 18:40:27 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board 17/11/2025 1) The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even in the second call none appeared, nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioners. 2) Under these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. -Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Chandrakant