Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58575 (PNJ)

AKHLESH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/27264/2025 · 2025-05-19

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 155 AKHLESH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : None for the petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA Learned State counsel who has appeared on advance notice of the petition, submits that warrants of arrest have been issued against the There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the matter has been passed over twice. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petitioner any more. Hence, the same is dismissed fo 19.05.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA None for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) Learned State counsel who has appeared on advance notice of the petition, submits that warrants of arrest have been issued against the There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the matter has been passed over twice. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petitioner any more. Hence, the same is dismissed fo (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.27264 of 2025 Date of decision: 19.05.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. Learned State counsel who has appeared on advance notice of the petition, submits that warrants of arrest have been issued against the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petitioner any more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No Learned State counsel who has appeared on advance notice of the There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present Jyoti 2025.05.20 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document