APHC010420292025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 21720/2025 Between: 1. B PRASANNA KUMARI,, W/O LATE K SIVA SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC PRINTING TECHNICIAN R AND B DIVISION, DHARMAVARAM , R/O. 25-585-5, PARTHASARADHI NAGAR, DHARMAVARAM, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VEIAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF R AND B, ADMINISTRATION, MG ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER R AND B, CIRCLE OFFICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, DHARMAVARAM, ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT 6. MEKALA MOHAN KRISHNA, , S/O. MALIIKARJUN AGED NOT KNOWN, R/O. BEHIND MAHINDRA KALYANA MANDAPAM, TIIAKNAGAR GUNTAKAL ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in trying to repost the 6th respondent in petitioners place by reverting her from the present post of Printing Technician at R and B Division, Dharmavaram, as highly illegal, arbitrary, improper and violation of principles of natural justice apart from violate of article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent not to revert the petitioner by reposting the 6th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the 3'^^ respondent not to revert the petitioner by reposting the 6^^ respondent in the post of Printing Technician at R & B Division, Dharmavaram, pending disposal of main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK JAHANGEER BASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in trying to repost the 6th respondent in place of the petitioner by reverting her from the present post of printing technician at R&B Division, Dharmavaram, as illegal, arbitrary. 2. In view of the letter dated 10.11.2025 addressed by Sri Shaik Jahangeer Basha, learned counsel for the Petitioner to the Registrar (Judicial) enclosing a copy of the letter dated 10.11.2025 addressed by the Petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, pending if any shall stand closed. ____________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 13th November, 2025 RKS