Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5856 (KAR)

SRI. TUKARAM NAGAPPA BISE ALIAS TUKARAM N BISE v. SRI. ANANDANAGOUDA S/O DODDANAGOUDA KULKARNI

CRL.RP/100292/2023 · 2025-01-23

Ravi V Hosmani

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1336 CRL.RP No. 100292 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100292 OF 2023 [397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)] BETWEEN: SRI TUKARAM NAGAPPA BISE @ TUKARAM N BISE, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. SRI SAI SIDDARUD SIDEESHWAR KRUPA, PLOT NO.37, RAIL NAGAR, NEAR RAJEEVA NAGAR, VIDYA NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580009. … PETITIONER (BY SRI S. B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI ANANDANAGOUDA, S/O DODDANAGOUDA KULKARNI, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. NEAR KANAKA PARAMESHWAR TEMPLE, MUNDARAGI, TQ: MUNDARAGI, DIST: GADAG-582118. … RESPONDENT (SOLE RESPONDENT SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 10.04.2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.8/2020 BY THE I ADDL. PRL. FAMILY COURT, GADAG WHEREIN APPELLATE COURT CONFIRMED THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUNDARAGI IN CC NO.69/2013 DATED 25.05.2018 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE PRESENT REVISION PETITION AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 138 OF NI ACT. MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Date: 2025.01.24 14:18:27 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1336 CRL.RP No. 100292 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI) Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo stating that entire fine amount of Rs.2,07,500/- was deposited before Trial Court on 02.03.2024. He has produced certified copy of order sheet in C.C.no.69/2013 to corroborate same. 2. In view of above, present petition would not survive for consideration. Taking memo on record, petition is dismissed as not surviving for consideration. SD/- (RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE CLK CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 35