APHC010001112019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 986/2019 Between: 1. NAGARAJU, SLO.SAMBAIAH. AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS. R/O.6TH LANE, LNS COLONY, PERECHERLA VILLAGE, MEDIKONDUR MANDAL, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MEDIKONDURU POLICE STATION, MEDIKONDUTU, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.S MEDIKONDURU GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in threatening to open rowdy sheet against petitioner and also declare the action of the respondents harassing the petitioner to come to Police Station as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India 2 and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AHMED KHAN MOHAMMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.986 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home already submitted that the allegations in the affidavit are not true and correct. Criminal cases were pending against the petitioner and he was asked to attend the police station in connection with the investigation of the cases, and then he filed the writ petition to interrupt the investigation. 3. Considering the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 20.11.2025 Pmk 4 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:986 OF 2019 Date: 20.11.2025 Pmk