Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58549 (AP)

TIRUVEEDULA SARADHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/30338/2022 · 2025-11-12

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010496662022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30338/2022 Between: 1. TIRUVEEDULA SARADHA, D/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE 48 YEARS, OCC. POLITICS, R/O KAKARAVADA VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTIRCT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE SHO, KAIKALURU POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. THE SHO, MANDAVALLI POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. THE SHO, MUDINEPALLI POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents rejected the representation dated 05-07-2022 of the petitioner made to accord permission to the petitioner to conduct campaign on Government schemes, without any valid reason, is illegal, arbitrary violative of Art 14, 19 of Constitution of India consequentially direct the respondent to accord permission to the petitioner to accord permission to the petitioner to conduct campaign on Government schemes, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the respondent to accord permission to the petitioner to accord permission to the petitioner to conduct campaign on Government schemes, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JAMI MADHAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents rejected the representation dated 05-07-2022 of the petitioner made to accord permission to the petitioner to conduct campaign on Government schemes, without any valid reason, is illegal, arbitrary violative of Art 14, 19 of Constitution of India consequentially direct the respondent to accord permission to the petitioner to accord permission to the petitioner to conduct campaign on Government schemes, and to pass” 2. Heard Sri T.V.V.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, considering the above submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.11.2025 M K K 179 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No: 30338 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 M K K