APHC010588202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30766/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK KHAJAJI BEG @ S.K. KHAJA BEG,, S/O S. USMAN BEG, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. M.P. EAST VILLAGE, NELLIMARLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P. POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PARVATHIPURAM, MANYAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OF OFFICER, PACHIPENTA POLICE STATION, PARVATHIPURAM, MANYAM DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OF OFFICER, SALUR POLICE STATION, PARVATHIPURAM, MANYAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 3 to 6 in disposing off the representation dt.10.10.2025 submitted by the petitioner, is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 to provide police protection to the petitioner considering his representation dt.10.10.2025 forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 to provide police protection to the petitioner considering his representation dt.10.10.2025 forthwith pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....pleased to issue an order direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of the respondents Nos.3 to 6 in disposing off the representation dt 10.10.2025 submitted by the petitioner is illegal arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.3 to 6 to provide police protection to the petitioner considering his representation dt 10.10.2025 forthwith” 2. Heard Sri B.Rama Shankara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the crime has been registered against the petitioner herein in Crime No.89 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 85 B.N.S. and 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the file of Pachipenta Police Station. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submitthat the representation of the petitioner would show that the offences are non- cognizable offences and hence the Police has not registered any crime on such representation. 5. Recorded. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out their remedies before the appropriate forum. The Police are also directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime registered against the petitioner. 6. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.11.2025 M K K 142 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No.30766 of 2025 Dated: 13.11.2025 M K K