Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58547 (CHH)

JK LAKSHMI CEMENT LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPT/177/2025 · 2025-11-17

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56047 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 177 of 2025 1 - Jk Lakshmi Cement Limited Through The Sr. Vice President, Malpuri Khurd, Ahiwara, Tahsil Dhamdha, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Vikas Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Secretary Department Of Mineral Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Mines, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi, Delhi. 5 - The Collector (Mineral Branch) Collectorate, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For Respondents No.1, 2, 3 & 5 For Respondent No.4 : : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Govt. Adocate Mr. R.K. Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 18/11/2025 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file representation RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.11.19 11:13:31 +0530 2 before the respondent authorities in light of the order dated 08.10.2025 passed by learned Division Bench of this Court in WP(T) No.263/2023. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to allow aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration, this petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner, as has been sought for. It is made clear that in the event of filing of representation by the petitioner, the same shall be decided within a further period of 90 days in accordance with law, by a speaking order. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar