APHC010592302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3345/2025 Between: 1. PALLIKONDA SURESH,, S/O. P. AMALA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. RAMAVARAPUMODI VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VIDHYA SAGAR NAIDU IPS, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. CH RAJA, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. A GANESH KUMAR, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BANTUMILLI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents invoking the provisions of the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of court Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps as per the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 in accordance with law, for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated14.10.2025in WP No. 28128 of 2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be Pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the order passed in WP No. 28128 of 2025, on the file of the Hon’ble Hligh Court of Andhra Prades at Amaravati in the above Contempt Case and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 14.10.2025 of this Court in W.P.No.28128 of 2025. 2. Heard S.Santhosh, learned counsel representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that the respondents-Police never committed any act of contempt in this matter. On 21.10.2025, the petitioner himself made a call to the Station House Officer, Bantumilli Police Station through 112. On such receiving of call, the patrolling staff has attended the call, visited the scene, pacified the situation and advised the petitioner that if he has any further grievance, he may approach the Police Station with a valid complaint. While police staff visiting the scene, the petitioner had intentionally taken the photographs of the police staff and produced those photo before this Court. Except that, the Police never interfered with the civil disputes. 4. In the light of the aforesaid premises, there is no act of contempt made by the respondents; this Contempt Case is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.11.2025 M K K 174 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Contempt Case No.3345 of 2025 Dated: 13.11.2025 M K K