APHC010165122019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7130/2019 Between: 1. PARVATAREDDY RAJANI, W/O SRIDHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O SANTHINAGAR AREA, KOVURU VILLAGE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VEDAYAPALEM/V TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. DR KANDALA VANI, W/O GIDDALURU SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.20-1075/6, R.K.NAGAR, KADAPA. 6. GIDDALURU SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.20-1075/6, R.K.NAGAR, KADAPA. 2 7. GIDDALURU BHARATH, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.20-1075/6, R.K.NAGAR, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering the FIR basing on the complaint of the petitioner dated 3.6.2019 (also sent through registered post) as illegal and contrary to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register the FIR and conduct a fair investigation and apprehend the accused and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to register the FIR basing on a complaint dated 3.6.2019 of the petitioner duly apprehending the accused, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O VENKATA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7130 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri P.Sai Aninash, learned counsel representing Sri O.Venkata Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to file another writ petition in accordance with law. 2. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to file another writ petition in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 13.11.2025 Pmk 4 06 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:7130 OF 2019 Date: 13.11.2025 Pmk