1 2025:CGHC:56290-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 428 of 2023 1 - Arvind Kumar Goenka S/o. Anjani Goenka Aged About 42 Years Presently R/o Shriram Navin Kumar And Sons Ispat Pvt Ltd, Phase-2, Siltara, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Md. Moidul Haque S/o Md. Anul Haque Aged About 44 Years Presently R/o Shriram Navin Kumar And Sons Ispat Pvt Ltd Phase-2, Siltara, Raipur District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station- Dharsiwa, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. Siddharth Shukla, Advocate appeared through video conferencing For Respondent/ State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.11.20 10:51:39 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 19.11.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :- “i. To Quash the Final Report No. 332/2022 dated 12th August 2022 filed by Respondent against the Petitioners. ii. To Quash the FIR No. 323/2021 dated 1st July 2021 registered by Respondent against the Petitioners. iii. Pass any other relief/order or direction, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstance of the case in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charges have been framed against the present petitioners by the learned trial Court. He further submits that the trial is in progress and the evidence of the prosecution witnesses are being recorded, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition to which learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 3 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioners after obtaining the photocopy of the same. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Amardeep/ S. Bhilwar