(1) 951sa08.98.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 951 SECOND APPEAL NO. 8 OF 1998 TUKARAM S/O DASHRATH POL ….Appellant VERSUS CHANDRAKANT S/O DASHRATH POL AND ORS …..Respondents Mr. N. J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 12 CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. None appeared for the appellant when called out. 2. Perused record. It appears that since 13-10-2025, none have appeared on behalf of the appellant. On 25-11-2025, the matter was listed; however, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant, and the matter was adjourned to 10-12-2025 at 04.00 am for final hearing. At that time, none appeared. Therefore, the matter was kept today under the caption ‘dismissal order’. 3. Despite the said fact, none appeared for the appellant. Mr. N. J. Pahune Patil appeared for the respondent. 4. It seems that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:35522 (2) 951sa08.98.odt 5. The interim relief, if any, stands vacated. 6. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ] VishalK/951sa08.98.odt 2 of 2