1 APHC010529682021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 264/2022 Between: 1. MENDU SRI SURYA VENKATA SATYA GANI RAJU,, S/O LATE SRI VISWANADHAM, HINDU, AGE- 59 YEARS, OCC- LIC AGENT, R/O DOOR NO. 14-19-46/7, BANK COLONY, MANDAPETA - 533 308, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME (GENERAL-A) DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. THE DY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CID (COASTAL ZONE), REGIONAL OFFICE, ADISESHAIAH STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE ADDL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CID, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM - 533 103, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CID, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM - 533 103, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CID, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM - 533 103, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. DANTULURI JAGANNADHA RAJU, S/O SRI VENKATAPATHI RAJU, R/O DOOR NO. 4-5-26, TEACHERS STREET, MANDAPETA - 533 308, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. Y L SIVAKALPANA REDDY(SC CUM SPL PP,CID) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioner and his family members to the CID Police Station, Rajamahendravaram and bringing pressure on them to come to a compromise with the 6th respondent in respect of the money decree obtained by the petitioner against the 6th respondent in O.S.No. 429 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram, Dated 17-06-2015, which is the subject matter of pending appeal in A.S.No. 81 of 2019 on the file of the court of the Principal District Judge, East Godvari at Rajamahendravaram as illegal, arbitrary and violative of personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members and for a consequential direction, directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the liberty of the petitioner and his family members and pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 13.11.2025 RSD 3 29 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.264 of 2022 Dt..13.11.2025 RSD