SMT.ALLAREDDY KANTHAMMA v. CHENNAREDDY RAMA SUBBA REDDY & 21 OTHERS, REP. BY P.P.
CRLRC/920/2007 · 2025-11-12
Subhendu Samanta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58523 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58523 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010110782007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 920 OF 2007 Between:
1. SMT.ALLAREDDY KANTHAMMA, W/O LATE RAGHURAMI REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. ...PETITIONER AND
1. CHENNAREDDY RAMA SUBBA REDDY 21 OTHERS REP BY P P, S/O BALARAMI REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 2. CHANNAREDDY KRISHNA REDDY, S/O BALARAMI REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 3. CHENNAREDDY GOPAL REDDY DIED, S/O. BALA KOTHANDA RAO, SERVICE R/O. PLOT NO. 28-A, OPP: SETWIN TRAINING CENTRE, NEAR MEDA HOSPITAL, J.J.NAGAR, NEREDMENT X ROAD,
4. CHENNAREDDY SEETHARAMI REDDY, S/O SESHU REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 5. CHENNAREDDY SURESH REDDY, S/O SEETHARAMI REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 6. CHENNAREDDY SESHU REDDY, S/O SEETHARAMI REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 7. CHENNAREDDY RAMACHANDRA REDDY DIED, A T I CAMPUS, VIDYANAGAR, HYDERABAD. 8. CHENNAREDDY SIVAKUMAR REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 9. CHENNAREDDY SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 10. CHENNAREDDY SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O SUNDARA RAMI REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 11. CHENNAREDDY VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O SUNDARA RAMI REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 12. CHENNAREDDY KRISHNA REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 13. NAIDU VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 14. CHENNAREDDY CHINA SUBBA REDDY DIED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, 301 AND 302, ALKARIM TRADE CENTRE, RANIGUNJ, SECUNDERABAD. 15. NEMALLAPUDI GOPAL REDDY, S/O PULLA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 16. CHENNAREDDY KAMALAKARA REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 17. YETURU SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O RAMANA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE
DIST. 18. CHENNAREDDY HARISCHANDRA REDDY, S/O PITCHI REDDY, R/O OGURUPADU VILLAGE. NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 19. KONDLAPUDI MALLA REDDY, S/O BALAKRISHNA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 20.
KONDLAPUDI SURESH REDDY, S/O MALLA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 21. INDUPURU SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, R/O POTTEPALEM (V & PO), NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DIST. 22. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M P CHANDRAMOULI
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
3. A BHASKARA CHARY The Court made the following Order:
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor placed on record the Report of the Station House Officer, Nellore Rural Police Station, who examined the Petitioner. From the said Report, it appears that the Petitioner had stated that at present she is not interested to proceed with the instant Criminal Revision Case. 2. The Criminal Revision Case cannot be disposed of for non prosecution; it has to be disposed of on merit only. Accordingly, the matter is taken up to pass an Order on merit. 3. The Instant Criminal Revision filed by the defacto complainant against Order of acquittal by the Courts below. According to the provisions of Section 372 of Cr.P.C an Appeal can be preferred by the defacto complainant against the Order of acquittal, but no revision is maintainable. Moreover, under the provisions of Section 401 (3) of Cr.P.C, prohibits a High Court from converting a finding of acquittal into one of conviction when exercising its revisional jurisdiction
4. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case filed by the defacto complainant against the Order of acquittal appears to be devoid of merit and same is hereby dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 13.11.2025
KK