BENDI DHANALAXMI @ KINTHALI DHANALAXMI AND ANOTAHER v. THE STATE OF A.P., REP BY PP.
CRLRC/1108/2008 · 2025-10-29
Subhendu Samanta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58518 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58518 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010129532008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1108/2008 Between:
1. BENDI DHANALAXMI @ KINTHALI DHANALAXMI AND ANOTAHER,, W/O. KINTHALI JAGADEESWARARAO, NATIVE OF SATYAVARAM (V), R/O. OF HOSPITAL ROAD JUNCTION, NARASANNAPETA TOWN, NARASANNAPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. BENDI SADANANDHARAO @ SADANANDHAM,, S/O. LATE NARAYANA, R/O. SATYAVARAM VILLAGE, NARASANNAPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF A.P., REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M VISWANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:1108 OF 2008 ORDER:
It is submitted that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners is no more.
2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor handed over the written instructions of investigating officer i.e., Sub-Inspector of Police, Narasannapeta Police Station.
3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor further submits that the instant criminal revision case has become infructuous as the accused/petitioners have already been acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge.
4. Having heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and also after perusing the written instructions from the Sub-Inspector of Police, it appears that after investigation, the investigating officer has submitted charge sheet on 03.01.2009; after conclusion of trial the accused/petitioners were acquitted from the case under Section 235(1) Cr.P.C. on 07.09.2012 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Court, Srikakulam.
5. In view of the above mentioned facts, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
3
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
30.10.2025 Pmk
4
14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Crl.R.C.No:1108 OF 2008
Date: 30.10.2025
Pmk