1 2025:CGHC:56206 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1036 of 2018 1 - Smt. Pushpa Ratre W/o W/o Late Kishan Kumar Ratre, Aged About 25 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Mudapar Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ..............Claimants., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Ankita Ratre, D/o D/o Late Kishan Kumar Ratre, Aged About 6 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Pushpa Ratre, W/o Late Kishan Kumar Ratre, R/o Mudapar Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Bharti Ratre, D/o D/o Late Kishan Kumar Ratre, Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Pushpa Ratre, W/o Late Kishan Kumar Ratre, R/o Mudapar Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Ayushi Ratre, D/o D/o Late Kishan Kumar Ratre, Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Pushpa Ratre, W/o Late Kishan Kumar Ratre, R/o Mudapar Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Hulas Bai Satnami, W/o W/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Satnami, Aged About 55 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Mudapar Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 6 - Kanhaiya Lal Satnami, S/o S/o Late Natthuram Aged About 58 Years RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Caste Satnami, R/o Mudapar Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Hasan Khan @ Mohd. Abid S/o S/o Mohd. Umar @ Umar Mohammad, Aged About 43 Years R/o Sothi, P. S. Sakti District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. ...................Driver., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Branch Manager, The New India Insurance Company Limited, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. Through The New India Insurance Company .............Insurer., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 18/11/2025 1. None appears for the appellant to argue the case even in second round, it appears that the appellant is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat