ARPIT JAISWAL PROPRIETOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/17337/2025 · 2025-05-16
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58513 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58513 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:82003 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 17337 of 2025 Applicant :- Arpit Jaiswal Proprietor Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Balwant Kumar Singh,Chandra Dutt,Laloo Yadav,Shravan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
1. Heard Sri Balwant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vikas Sharma, learned State Law Officer, who appears for the State.
2. Though the application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicant for quashing the the Summoning order dated 22.08.2024 passed by Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)-2/ A.C.J.M, Gautam, Budh Nagar, along with entire proceeding, in Complaint No. 9244 of 2024 (M/s S.P.G Infraprojects Vs. M/s VASA Enterprises) under section- 138 Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, Police Station Sector 20 Noida, District-Gautam Budh Nagar, but
learned counsel for the applicant as per the instructions submits that he be permitted to move appropriate proceeding before the court below for enlargement on bail.
3. Learned State Law Officer has no objection to the same.
4. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar and the statements so sought to be made by them, the application stands disposed of while observing that in case appropriate proceeding in the form of bail application is preferred before the court below, then the same shall be decided with most expedition strictly in accordance with the law of the land.
Order Date :- 17.5.2025 N.S.Rathour (Vikas Budhwar, J) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad