SANAUL @SANAULLAH@SANAULLAH HOQUE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM (A)/3502/2025 · 2025-11-14
Jay Sengupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58506 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58506 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14.11.2025 Court No.28 Item No.47 ssi CRM (A) 3502 of 2025
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No. 730 of 2025 dated 10.06.2025 under Sections 137 (2)/140 (3) of the BNS, 2023 read with 4/18 of the POCSO Act. And In the matter of: Sanaul @ Sanaullah @ Sanaullah Hoque ….Applicant/Petitioner
Mr. Mritunjay Chatterjee Mrs. Suchismita Chakraborty Mr. Imdadul Hoque …for the petitioner Mrs. Manisha Sharma Mr. Prakash Mishra
..for the State Mr. Abhishek Chakraborty Mr. Musharaf Alam Sk
…for the de facto
Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner, the de facto complainant and the State.
Perused the case diary.
Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the statement of the minor victim girl made before the learned Magistrate, I do not consider this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)