CRM-M-14844 IN T 398-2 SHELLY KUM STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present: Mr Mr Mr Mr RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Suraksha Sanh 22.06.2025, und 190 of B.N.S., 2 Beas, District A arising therefro (Annexure P-3) 2. Th to appear befor and the learned of the comprom 14844-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da KUMAR @ SAHIL AND OTHERS Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Sukhbir Maandi, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Amarjeet Kaur, Advocate and Mr. J.S. Mahal, Advocate for respo ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Se Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quas 5, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 11 N.S., 2023 (lateron added offence U/s trict Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P- erefrom on the basis of compromise 3). This Court vide order dated 18.03 before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to arned Magistrate was directed to send promise. PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-14844-2026 Date of decision: 07.04.2026 HERS ….Petitioners ....Respondents UPINDERJIT CHAHAL ate for the petitioners. te and r respondent No.4. der Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik quashing of FIR No.126 dated (1), 117(2), 126(2), 351(3), 191(3), ce U/s 118(2) of BNS) Police Station -2) and subsequent proceedings romise/settlement dated 27.01.2026 18.03.2026 had directed the parties rate to get their statements recorded o send its report qua the genuineness s ents garik ated 1(3), ation ings 2026 rties rded ness GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-14844 3. Pur Sub-Divisional statements reco Divisional Judic 03.04.2026 to t parties voluntar 4. Lea have not dispute 5. In continue with th 6. Fol of this Court in another 2007 Supreme Court SCC 303, this Sections 115(2) (lateron added Amritsar (Rura therefrom on th P-3) are quashe 7. Pen of, accordingly. 07.04.2026 Gurpreet 14844-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, pa sional Judicial Magistrate, Baba B s recorded. On the basis of the s l Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sa to the effect that the compromise h luntarily and without any coercion or u Learned State counsel as well as disputed the factum of compromise bet In view of the above, no useful with the proceedings before the trial C Following the principles laid down ourt in Kulwinder Singh and others 007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 an ourt in Gian Singh Versus State of , this petition is allowed and FIR No 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), 351(3) added offence U/s 118(2) of BNS) (Rural) (Annexure P-2) and sub on the basis of compromise/settlemen shed. Pending miscellaneous application ingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No er, parties have appeared before the aba Bakala Sahib and got their the statements so recorded, Sub- ala Sahib has submitted report dated mise has been effected between the ion or undue influence. ell as counsel for respondent No.4 ise between the parties. useful purpose would be served to trial Court in the instant FIR. d down by the Full Bench judgment hers Versus State of Punjab and 2 and approved by the Hon’ble te of Punjab and others (2012) 10 IR No.126 dated 22.06.2025, under 351(3), 191(3), 190 of B.N.S., 2023 BNS) Police Station Beas, District d subsequent proceedings arising tlement dated 27.01.2026 (Annexure lication(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No e the their - ated n the 4 d to ment nd ble 10 nder 2023 strict ising xure osed AL) GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.