Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58493 (AP)

Buddepalli Adeppa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5574/2022 · 2025-11-12

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010091272022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5574/2022 Between: BUDDEPALLI ADEPPA, S/O B. RANGAPPA AGED 63 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE R/O ANANDARAOPET (VILLAGE), SINGANAMALA (MANDAL) ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SINGANAMALA (MANDAL), ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. SRI B VENKATA NARAYNA, , S/O B NAGANNA AGED 40 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE R/O ANANDRAOPET (VILLAGE), SINGANAMALA (MANDAL) ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J DILEEP KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent no.3 in interfering with the civil dispute which is pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India besides being in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2 3rd Respondent Station House Officer not to coerce the Petitioner to withdraw the Suit and settle the issue with the unofficial Respondents or to intervene into the civil dispute in any manner pending disposal of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Ms.B.Swathi, learned counsel would submit that Sri J.Dileep Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner has become Government Pleader. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5574 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh