Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:87056 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16515 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet Chauhan @ Putur Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Kumar Raghuvanshi,Ashvanee Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. Instant application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S seeking bail in Case Crime No. 349 of 2024, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C., Police Station Chiluatal, District Gorakhpur. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report. He has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to ulterior motive. Prosecutrix in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS has not supported the version of first information report. Prosecutrix has categorically stated that she went Bombay on her own sweet will as she was in love with the applicant. She has also categorically submitted that applicant did not establish any physical relation with her. Learned counsel further submitted that investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed on 10.04.2025. Cognizance has been taken. It is further submitted that applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and he is languishing in jail since 30.03.2025. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant also undertaken that he will abide by all terms and conditions as imposed by this Court while granting bail. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposed the instant bail application but he has not contradicted the facts as stated above by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. Heard Sri Ashvanee Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri K. P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State in advance notice and perused the contents made in the first information report as well as material placed on record. 5. It is admitted fact that applicant is a man of clean antecedents aged around 22 years old boy and he is languishing in jail since 30.03.2025. Charge sheet has already been filed after completion of investigation. Cognizance has been taken by the competent Court as stated above. It is also undertaken on behalf of applicant that he will abide by all terms and conditions as imposed by this Court while granting bail. No material brought on record by the learned A.G.A. that if the applicant is enlarged on bail, he will misuse the bail order. 6. Taking into consideration the age of the applicant, nature of offence as well as other reasons as stated above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the bail application. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant-Ranjeet Chauhan @ Putur, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad