APHC010078942022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 4914/2022 Between: BIGINI TULASILKANTH, S/O BOGINI RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, FLAT NO. G1, 1ST FLOOR GOKUL SAI APARTMENT BESIDE FLY OVER OLD VEDAYAPALEM, ANDHRA KESARI NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( HOME DEPARTMENT ) SECRETRIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEDAYAPALEM POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRI SRINIVASA RAO, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEDAYAPALEM POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. KONEDINA RAMESH BABU, S/O RAMESHMA BABU, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, B.V NAGAR, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. POKUURU ANKAIAH, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, BANK COLONY B.V NAGAR, NELLORE TOWN SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 to 5, who were harassing the petitioner by directing to settle the financial issues with Respondent No. 6 and 7 by way of executing Registered sale deed of the petitioner Property purchased through Registered Sale Deed No. 443/2018 as illegal arbitrary and against the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents No. 4 to 5 for not to interfere in to the civil disputes between the petitioner and Respondent No.6 and 7 by way of calling the petitioner to the Respondent No. 5 Police Station.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents. 3. Sri V.RoopeshKumar Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.6 and 7, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4914 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh