RAVINDER SINGH v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. SANGRUR AND OTHERS
CR/2978/2025 · 2025-05-20
Alka Sarin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58482 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58482 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
128
CR-2978-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2025
RAVINDER SINGH
.... Petitioner VERSUS BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. AND ORS .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Pawan Kumar, Senior Advocate with
Ms. Vidushi, Advocate and
Mr. Japsehaj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate and
Mr. Arnav Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Nitin Kant Setia, Advocate (joined through hybrid mode) Mr. Sahil Sabherwal, Advocate for respondent No.8
Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.11.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1.
After arguing for some time, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he does not wish to press the present revision petition on merits. He, however, prays that the Trial Court may be
directed to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC expeditiously, preferably within a period of 15 days from today.
2.
In view of the statement made by learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the present revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. The Trial Court is requested to decide the AMAN JAIN 2025.05.21 09:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment
128
CR-2978-2025 (O&M)
-2-
application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, pending before it, at first instance preferably within a period of 15 days from today in accordance with law.
3.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
20.05.2025
(ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain
JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.05.21 09:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment