Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58475 (BOM)

SIDDHANT SHIRISH GADIYA v. GANESH RAMRAO WAGCHAURE AND ANOTHER

CA/10170/2025 · 2025-10-08

Shri R M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10170 OF 2025 IN ARB/9/2022 SIDDHANT SHIRISH GADIYA VERSUS GANESH RAMRAO WAGCHAURE AND ANOTHER ... Mr. R. L. Chhabda, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. C. Arora, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. H. S. Adwant h/f Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1. This Application is for extension of time for completion of Arbitration proceeding. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions, records no objection for extension of time as sought in the Application. 3. Learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 records no objection by reserving his rights to agitate the issue which is already raised before the Arbitrator about he being not necessary party to the said proceedings. 4. Perusal of Application indicates that it is fit case for grant of extension of time as prayed. 5. In view of above, Application is allowed in terms of prayer 965 CA 10170.2025.odt 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:28178 clause ‘B’. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 965 CA 10170.2025.odt 2 of 2