Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58467 (AP)

TOLLA PULLANNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6871/2022 · 2025-11-12

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010115292022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6871/2022 Between: 1. TOLLA PULLANNA, S/O. CHENNAIAH, AGED. 76 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO.4/84, B.C.COLONY, CHERLAKOTTURU VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. KANUKUNTLA NADIPI MADANNA, S/O. MADANNA, AGED. 56 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO.4-113-1, CHERLAKOTTURU VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. ROTIKATI VENKATESWARLU, S/O. MADDILETI, AGED. 47 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO.4-107/A, CHERLAKOTTURU VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL, GOVERDHANAGIRI MAZARA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELDURTHY CIRCLE POLICE STATION, VELDURTHY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VELDURTHY POLICE STATION, VELDURTHY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. BHUMANNAGARI SANJEEVA REDDY, S/O. HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED. 38 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.4/52, O.C. COLONY, CHERLAKOTTURU VILLAGE, GOVERDHANAGIRI MAZARA, VELDURTHI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. VADDURU VARALAKSHMI, W/O. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-27, B.RAMADURGAM VILLAGE, YEDDUPENTA MAZARA, DONE MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. POTHIREDDYGARI ARUNAMNIA, W/O. MAHESWARA REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. NERAVADA VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, 2 KURNOOL DISTRICT. 9. ALAVALA SURYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. VUTAKALLU VILLAGE, GUTTI MANDAL,' ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SARATH KUMAR D Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents particularly the respondents 4 and 5 at-the in-stance of the 'respondents 6 to 9 in interfering in petitioners' possession and enjoyment of their agriculture. landed properties admeasuring Ac.10.11 cents aticrAc.14.47 Cents-. respectively covered by Survey Nos. 250 and 249 situated in Peremula Village of Veldurthy. Malicia' in Kurnool District and .insisting them to vacate .there from in order to yield-to the.terms.of the respondents 6 to 9, as irregular, irrational, Without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to. interfere' in any manner with petitioners' possession and enjoyment over the said landed properties and with their personal - liberty.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the interim order dated 22.03.2022, the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri D.Sarath Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. For ready reference, the interim order dated 22.03.2022 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, is extracted hereunder: 3 “In the interim period, if the crime is not registered by this date, the respondent Nos.4 and 5 are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute with regard to lands admeasuring Ac.10.11 cents and Ac.14.47 cents respectively in Sy.Nos.250 and 249 situated in Peremula Village of Veldurthy Mandal, Kurnool District.” 5. In the light of the above interim order, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6871 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh