Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:56021
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13055 of 2025 1 - Purushottam Singh Nikhar S/o Shri Shankar Singh Nikahar Aged About 37 Years (Assistant Teacher L.B. Primary School Ratkhandi), R/o Village Belgahna Block - Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Haripal Singh Paikara S/o Shri Deewan Singh Paikara Aged About 50 Years (Assistant Teacher L.B. Primary School, Sonsai), R/o Village Lamari Dabri, Tenganwada, Block - Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ramesh Singh Uike S/o Late Shankar Singh Uike Aged About 39 Years (Assistant Teacher L.B. Primary School Sargod), R/o Village Tenganwada, Block - Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Dinesh Kumar Tamboli S/o Chhotelal Tamboli Aged About 40 Years (Assistant Teacher L.B. Primary School Jali), R/o Village Jali Block - Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Dilesh Kumar Dhritlahare S/o Tijau Ram Dhritlahare Aged About 37 Years (Assistant Teacher L.B. Primary School Konchara), R/o Village Pahanda, Miththu Nawagao, Block - Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - The Director Public Instruction Directorate, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - The Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. 4 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.11.19 11:04:30 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 18.11.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have already preferred representations before the respondent authorities and prays that they may be allowed to pursue the same before them.
2. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners seems to be just and proper.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika