Page No.1 of 2 IN MAC-107-2023 2025:CGHC:55457 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 107 of 2023 1 - Ajay Panjwani S/o Kundanlal Panjwani Aged About 42 Years R/o Mahasati Mandir Ward, Bhatapara, Post/thana/tahsil- Bhatapara, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh..............(Non Applicant No.1) 2 - Vjay Kumar S/o Ishwardas Tanwani Aged About 21 Years R/o Bhagatsingh Ward, Bhatapara, Post/thana/tahsil- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh..............(Non Applicant No.2) ... Appellants Versus 1 - Ku. Nisha (Minor) D/o Late Pappu Patwa Aged About 11 Years Minor Through Its Gaurdian Grand Mother Smt. Jaambai Wd/o Budhram Patwa, R/o Gandhi Mandir Ward, Mandi Road, Bhatapara, Post/thana/tahsil- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh..............(Claimants) 2 - Aaryan Patwa S/o Late Pappu Patwa Aged About 8 Years Minor Through His Gaurdian Grand Mother Smt. Jaambai Wd/o Budhram Patwa, R/o Gandhi Mandir Ward, Mandi Road, Bhatapara, Post/thana/tahsil- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar,bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Jaambai Wd/o Budhram Patwa Aged About 60 Years R/o Gandhi Mandir Ward, Mandi Road, Bhatapara, Post/thana/tahsil- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar,bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - S.K. Industries Village Kholwa, Thana/tahsil- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar,bhatapara, Chhattisgarh...............(Owner Of Cg 04-Ch- 8678) ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellant : Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.1-3 : Mr. SP Sannat, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Page No.2 of 2 IN MAC-107-2023 Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 13.11.2025 1. Heard on IA No.3, which is an application seeking permission to withdraw this appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if